Reading Journal, Disc Golf Scores, and other things that don't seem to fit on my web site.
Sunday, August 06, 2006
What's Better? "Living on a Thin Line" or Days of WIne and Roses?
Ah nothing like a good voting scandal to really rock the house. Malick was in the lead and even declared the winner by one exit poll, but late reports from the precincts pushed The Kinks ahead. No hanging chads here, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, allowing the certification to stand.
Jack Lemmon and Lee Remick had their own battles to fight...over a band of zombies. So, all due apologies to the Malick multitude. This semi-final asks:
"What's Better?": "Living on a Thin Line" or Days of Wine and Roses?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I'm overcoming my earlier qualms and voting on principle this time:
"Living on a Thin Line"
I too am voting on principle, albeit a different one: Whoever takes down the mighty Malick must be taken down. Days of Wine and Roses it is.
Blake Edwards, Jack Lemmon, Jack Klugmann. It has comedy written all over it -- but it's dead serious. The Days of Wine and Roses!
Days of Wine and Roses. It is bourbon whiskey to the Kinks' Bacardi Breezer.
Post a Comment