Sunday, August 06, 2006

What's Better? "Living on a Thin Line" or Days of WIne and Roses?




Ah nothing like a good voting scandal to really rock the house. Malick was in the lead and even declared the winner by one exit poll, but late reports from the precincts pushed The Kinks ahead. No hanging chads here, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, allowing the certification to stand.

Jack Lemmon and Lee Remick had their own battles to fight...over a band of zombies. So, all due apologies to the Malick multitude. This semi-final asks:

"What's Better?": "Living on a Thin Line" or Days of Wine and Roses?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm overcoming my earlier qualms and voting on principle this time:
"Living on a Thin Line"

John Adair said...

I too am voting on principle, albeit a different one: Whoever takes down the mighty Malick must be taken down. Days of Wine and Roses it is.

Darrel Manson said...

Blake Edwards, Jack Lemmon, Jack Klugmann. It has comedy written all over it -- but it's dead serious. The Days of Wine and Roses!

M. Leary said...

Days of Wine and Roses. It is bourbon whiskey to the Kinks' Bacardi Breezer.