Reading Journal, Disc Golf Scores, and other things that don't seem to fit on my web site.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
What's Better?: Being There or Being John Malkovich?
Hal Roach vs. Spike Jonze! Peter Sellers vs...well, John Malkovich. These two items are both comedies that are actually funny but that are also surprisingly thoughtful and slyly provocative.
What's Better? Being There or Being John Malkovich?
6 comments:
Being There gets my vote.
BJM works until the third act, then it falls apart.
Whereas Being There's final act is a perfect culmination of the film.
I like to watch Being There more than Being John Malkovich.
Love the Spike Jonze film, but Being There still gets my vote. I like to watch.
Bucking the system since 2006...
Gonna go with Malcovich.
Being There is transcendent.
Both are good, but I thought Being John Malkovich was funnier.
Post a Comment